For those familiar with our blog, PowerPoint needs no introduction. However, Apple users may be more familiar or comfortable using Keynote. Compared to PowerPoint, Keynote offers a clean and simple interface. It provides a variety of built-in templates that give the slides a fresh look that are easy to customise and complete with themes, animation effects, and transitions.
Keynote allows users to import QuickTime files for conversion to YouTube and — being an Apple product — it integrates easily across its range of devices, allowing you to design and switch easily between MacBook, iPad, and iPhone seamlessly. The program is specially designed to naturally integrate images, sounds, videos, and other multimedia files, offering the user-friendliness and simplicity you commonly see in Apple products.
However, PowerPoint does offer more capabilities and options for animation — particularly in 3D animation. Exported files lose bits and pieces of the graphics or animations used.
PowerPoint offers more formatting and design options available than Keynote. When it comes to making the choice of Keynote vs. PowerPoint for presentation software, understanding where each tool works best is key.
Keynote is presentation software designed for Apple devices, so it will only work on computers, tablets, and phones running iOS software. Keynote allows users to create presentations that look sleek without a lot of design capability.
The tools are easy and intuitive. The slide navigator includes options for designing slides with different layouts, animations, fonts and you can even bring in presentations from other software.
Most of the functionality in Keynote vs. PowerPoint is a default choice for presentations for millions of people. However, there are several other flaws as well: Too many features. PowerPoint allows you to do a lot. Crowded interface. The toolbar in the PowerPoint contains so much stuff it may scare away an inexperienced user.
To sum up: which one is better? Most read articles:. Powerpoint design: step-by-step instruction you may follow to create awesome slides 10 Common mistakes in presentations most students make 30 60 90 Day Plan: A blueprint for professional growth 50 Tips on how to improve PowerPoint presentations in Latest articles. Leave your phone number, and we will contact you in a moment. Unfolded, it is 20 times as large approximately 24 by 36 , and it is 2-sided.
One side is your typical politcal map, with states and highways and rivers and such. The other side is entitled "History of the Land" and includes annotations in complete sentences, no less! I don't want to think of the projection equipment that would be necessary to show this information on the computer screen. Time, of course, is often-times best encoded graphically through the use of time; as such, data movies can be quite compelling.
Getting these to survive the transformation into static paper-space is difficult. The real challenge, as least in my work, is to get the movies to do things in a high enough resolution to make the move from high-resolution paper to low-resolution computer worthwhile. Does the trade-off of movieness for resolution buy us increased understanding? If so, we ought to use the method or methods that improve our understanding of the process that is generating the data.
It shows how the incidence of prostate carcinoma has evolved over the past 30 years. The changing numbers inset into the graph are not relevant here, other than the year. The enormous increase in prostate cancer cases in the early 's was probably due to the introduction of the PSA blood test. On screen resolution, data density, and animation Rafe brings up some interesting points. Here's my take on a few things bullets! Please note: I'm not trying to be a Gore cheerleader some of the comments in the above links bring excellent critique of his conclusions - but I am very interested in how new technology can support speakers and their messages.
This seems to be an example of this done well. I prefer Keynote for creating presentations because it's elegant and intuitive to use. PP looks especially clunky next to it. But I agree that Keynote falls into the same kinds of hamfisted communication methods. It just looks a whole lot better while doing it, so maybe there's an added danger in the elegance.
I also like Keynote because it allows you to export slides to jpgs and gives the option of saving each new bit of info to a new slide. I put the jpgs on my iPod 30GB, color screen and use the photo capabilities for my presentation. Saves lugging a laptop to a conference. All my gear--cables, ipod, infrared dock and remote control--fit in one pocket and weigh less than six oz. After years of boredom with speakers using PP and reading their boring slides to me, I did something kind of strange this past fall.
I made a Keynote presentation with no text. I made handouts with my stats in legible and understandable charts that people could refer to during the talk and take home later. I only had images on my slides, using Keynote's superior shadowing and animation options to make them look really nice.
Then I talked, using the images to support and illustrate my message. No charts, no words, no bullets. Four months later I'm still getting email from people who were in the audience saying it was the most memorable presentation they'd seen all year. Funny thing is, I'd given the same talk with a screen full of text and hadn't gotten any reaction by email at all. I'm going minimal from now on. Response to Apple's Keynote vs Microsoft PowerPoint On the other hand, if you do want to pitch, Keynote may be the best tool available.
I have seen it used by Lawrence Lessig and Aaron Swartz separately for pitching. Their technique somebody called "Slides as chorus", and it works like this: The presenter speaks fluently and never, ever refers to the slides or reads from them.
Each slide contains either a picture or a very short string of text, perhaps just one word. As he is speaking, he advances the slides in sync with what he is saying; there can be several slides per sentence.
It works very well to help a skilled pitcher create emotional fervor. Both of their presentations were very fast-paced and almost without pauses. You can see Lessig's presentation on copyright and what he calls "free culture" here or on the TED site :. Response to Apple's Keynote vs Microsoft PowerPoint I've been happy, in the last 5 years, with my switch from 35 mm slides to digital projectors.
0コメント