In addition, Bratz is a show about high school kids. Parents with the issues of makeup should realize most high school kids wear make-up.
Just because your kid will watch this show doesn't mean they will wear make-up. This show may seem like money, shopping, clothes and fashion is the only thing important and what makes you , you but its not.
It's more then that. There is always a lesson in the show ,it may not be direct but if you really watch and sit down to understand you will realize what the episode was about. When they took of this show, it pissed me off and other fans and viewers.
I wasn't a crazy big fan but I liked the show. It helped me realize not to be a follower but a leader. What being a friend is all about. In episodes where they might seem mean or violence I disagreed. I wouldn't say violence like killing and shooting. It showed self defense and how to stick up for yourself an example of that would be in season 1 episode 8 "It's Not About Me week".
As you can see in that episode it shows how to stick up for a friend in need and not to care about yourself all the time. To help others and realize the world does not evolve around you. To show how lending a hand isn't bad. This show also includes helping the community, giving back.
When they win money from events instead of going shopping, spending, they give back to their community which shows that this show isn't about money to themselves. It shows that they don't care about money and how much to spend on shopping, it shows that you should always give back to your community, help out where you live. Many parents believed that this show is bad because of the mini skirts, so did the review for the Bratz. I disagree, this show shows you how to express yourself in fashion.
It's not telling you to wear mini skirts and even though they did wear mini skirts they were walking appropriately, they sat down right, they wore high boots to their knees, they didn't bend over or opens their legs. They knew how to walk and carry themselves. This show is not telling kids to wear stuff like that. It showing kids that you don't always have to be plain in what you wear. If you have a certain style or want to be creative go ahead. It showing kids that you don't have to wear one type of color, there other colors no matter if your a goth, tomboy, girly girl or whatever criteria you feel your style is in.
In addition, it teaches leadership and to stand up for what you believe, don't back down. Their is always going to be someone to bring you down, trying to hold you back because your more successful then they are. In all their episodes you will see that Burdine tries to make them fail in their success. For example, in Season 1 and all their episodes. She tries and she tries but in the end she always fail.
Her attempts doesn't work because the Bratz work together and continue to find a way to complete their task and go beyond their limit. This show also shows how to be a good sport and candidate. In season 1 episode 7 " Manicuring Candidate" that episode shows that you shouldn't scoop to the other people levels but beat them fair and square. There are times when you have to come as one to solve a problem then continue to go separate ways when its done for the people who work with people they don't get along with.
In season 1 episode 6 "Pet Show", which is a good example that shows how two people who don't get along well work together to solve a problem. In one of their movie BFF. Their are episodes that shows you how you should treat one another and tell the truth. How lying will make a small problem become bigger. It even shows situations where you tried to help someone and you get in trouble even if you was innocent doing the right thing.
In that particular episode Burdine internships took free samples thinking they can leave with them. Yasmin tries to tell them to put it back and pulls the bags. The manager and the police comes. Yasmin who told them the truth,but the interns decided to get her in trouble with them and played like they didn't know her. It shows how karma works and that what goes around comes around. To treat other's how you would want to be treated. The episode shows how people tried to influence others. This is were true trusted, friends come in and being humble.
Just because a person treat you bad doesn't mean you sit there and watch something worst happen to them even if they do deserve it. Bratz is not like most shows where the boys look super girly. They did had an episode where the boy dress like a girl but that episode was to show a boy how a girl wanted to be treated.
That all girls don't want thugs, but nice sweet young men. It also shows the girls perspective when Dylan realize that not every girl wants a jerk. The episode was 9 and the season was 1 "trading faces". Seeing a different point of view. It shows how boys and girls should respect one another. For the girls , if someone is being a jerk boy leave.
An example for that would be in their movie Bratz Rock Angelz. For the people it helped with the advice they gave. This show had situations that are some what similar to what some teens, girls, boys go threw today. It shows you that school is important. If you have to stop a certain activity because your grades seem to be going down. Stop, grades and school are more important. If you watch the episodes you can see how friends helped each other get good grades, find a way to pass and what classes to take.
Watching this show will teach kids and teens that everyone has different personalities and look different. Don't judge someone off of first appearance. Corporate ownership of ideas, the dramatic extension of the terms of copyright, and a wild expansion of what counts as protectable intellectual property have together undermined the original purpose of intellectual-property law.
Nine out of ten patents granted in the United States are now owned by corporations. Congress passed ten copyright-extension acts in the course of the twentieth century; copyright now lasts for seventy years after the death of the author. Corporations have attempted to claim exclusive legal rights to everything from yoga moves to genetic sequences.
Tattoos are protectable intellectual property, but nearly all tattoo artists operate outside that legal realm, following, instead, a set of industry norms. Pornography, which has historically been the first to adopt and adapt to new technologies, is generally lax about copyright enforcement and has instead devised a new business model, based on sharing not content but experiences.
By operating outside intellectual-property law, each of these industries has thrived, both creatively and economically. A counter case could be made that industries that are vigilant about copyright infringement—action-figure franchises, say, or television sitcoms—may have made a lot of money for the corporations that own them, but the results have not generally been distinguished for their creativity.
Calls for reform, often sounded, have not been heeded. One of the loudest and sharpest critics of the intellectual-property corporate rampage was Judge Kozinski. As Lobel reports, Kozinski is that rare bird—a judicial celebrity. He hobnobs with Hollywooders, and kept his own IMDb page, where he had personally rated more than a thousand films. A movie buff and a libertarian, Kozinski is also a free-speech advocate, a position that extends to both pornography and intellectual property. Kozinski, in other words, would appear to agree with Joseph Story and Louis Brandeis.
Something has to be done! Grab a pad and back that gorgeous butt in here! Her intellectual property is worthless. As Kozinski would write in his opinion in Mattel v. Circuit Court, was ranked No. As the case slowly made its way to trial, Bratz sales continued to soar. But Bratz made race into a consumer accessory, and, as the cultural critic Lisa Guerrero has pointed out, Jade, Cloe, Yasmin, Sasha, and the rest of the Bratz never work; they only shop.
Mattel v. On that computer, they found pornography, and also software used to wipe hard drives. Kozinski, meanwhile, was reprimanded for posting pornography, but, after apologizing and shutting down his Web site, he remained on the bench, which is how he came to adjudicate the doll wars when, on appeal, Mattel v. Not Mattel was his answer, in a ruling in which he listed a series of errors made by the lower court, including its finding that the features of an idealized female body were ideas that anyone could own.
Does Mattel own them? The judge awarded MGA more than three hundred million dollars in damages. Asda has been condemned for marketing black lacy underwear to nine-year-olds.
Academics believe that the influence and attitudes of parents, siblings, and friends can. Subscription Notification. We have noticed that there is an issue with your subscription billing details. Kinda fun, kinda silly, no more realistic than — and not to be taken any more seriously than — a bepetticoated Holly Hobbie or a Spiderman figurine or an Olsen twin. Of course, not every girl is as self-possessed — nor, perhaps, as bright and well-loved and confident — as my niece, and so not every girl is going to regard a Bratz Doll with the same degree of clear-sightedness.
And for this reason, among others, I still think that Bratz Dolls — or, rather, the creators and marketers of Bratz Dolls — are, in their way, hell-spawn. But any instrument of evil is really only evil insofar as it is wielded as such, no?
My concerns about the decline of Western civilization are, although related, another matter entirely; in any case, my fruitless anxieties about that decline should probably be kept, so far as possible, separate from my anxieties about matters over which I have some control.
At least, that is, until WonderBaby tells me that she wants a Bratz of her own, at which point I may revisit and revise this entire argument, because I am entitled, as a mother, to reverse attitude on absolutely anything I choose. Check it out: More reviews! More MBT! More contests! To top 7 May. Do I go to Sanctimonious Hypocrite Hell for that?
0コメント